According to New York Times, Google has been facing criticism from some users for allowing articles that aren't useful to appear in search results. This is one time Google should do things their way. What may seem useful to one person may not seem that useful to someone else. Just what do they mean by not being useful?
When it comes to sites copying content, I can see another users point. There are about a thousand people probably searching for this same topic, and every one may have their own opinion. That does not mean that all of the sites writing on the same topic are not useful. People need more than one opinion when they search, and then they can choose what sounds the best to them. It is possible that people in the world can have similar thoughts without seeing each other's content. However, if a person just simply copies content word for word instead of writing their own, yes, these sites may not be as useful.
No comments:
Post a Comment